Antitrust Formalism Is Dead! Long Live Antitrust Formalism! Some Implications of American Needle v. NFL
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction Few cases before the Supreme Court have been preceded by so many rival interpretations and grand predictions—from the death of modern antitrust policy to the end of professional football1—as American Needle v. National Football League.2 The Court’s decision reversed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which had held that with regard to licensing NFL intellectual property, the NFL and its constituent teams constituted a single-entity outside the reach of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Thus, the Court held, American Needle’s claims would survive another day, remanded to the district court for evaluation under the Rule of Reason. While unanimous, the Court raised nearly as many questions as it resolved; observers have depicted the opinion as everything from an antitrust sea change3 to an idiosyncratic application of a niche doctrine with
منابع مشابه
Can HMOs wield market power? Assessing antitrust liability in the imperfect market for health care financing.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .. .................................... 93 I. Background . ................................ 102 A. Statutory Basis for Antitrust Offenses ........... 102 B. Judicial Construction of Antitrust Laws ......... 103 1. Monopolization and attempted monopolization: section 2 offenses ........................ 103 2. Combinations or contracts in restraint of trade: section...
متن کاملAccountable care organizations: Implications for antitrust policy
Introduction T his analysis examines accountable care organizations (ACOs) and assesses their implications for antitrust policy. Consideration of the antitrust implications of ACOs is timely. Both the House and Senate health reform measures contemplate the creation of ACOs as a new class of Medicare provider while providing parallel legal authority under Medicaid. It also is possible that using...
متن کاملSome Aspects of Abuse of Dominant Positions in European Community Antitrust Law
This article starts by looking at Article 86 of the ECC Treaty governing antitrust violations and the significance of “dominant position” in applying the Rule. The author then explains how in light of United Brands v. Commission, a Court of Justice of the European Communities Court, evidence of dominance may be classified in four categories. Next, the author explains the different types of abus...
متن کاملSunk Costs and Real Options in Antitrust Analysis
Sunk costs play a central role in antitrust economics but are often misunderstood and mismeasured. This chapter clarifies some of the conceptual and empirical issues related to sunk costs, and explains their implications for antitrust analysis. The chapter is particularly concerned with the role of uncertainty. When market conditions evolve unpredictably (as they almost always do), firms incur ...
متن کاملAntitrust, health care quality, and the courts.
Antitrust law represents the principal legal tool that the United States employs to police private markets, yet it often relegates quality and nonprice considerations to a secondary position. While antitrust law espouses the belief that vigorous competition will enhance quality as well as price, little evidence exists of the practical ability of courts to deliver on that promise. In this Articl...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010